Re: Mailman vulnerability

Martin Marques wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
> 
>> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 06:45, Martin Marques wrote:
>>
>>> Would you people like to see the patches first or do I send the src.rpm?
>>
>>
>> Either way.  We now manage FC-4 in CVS so adding just a patch to generate a
>> updates-testing rpm is easy enough.
> 
> 
> OK. I finished adding patches to mailman from RHEL to FC4, risulting in
> the next src.rpm:
> 
> http://bugs.unl.edu.ar/~martin/mailman-2.1.8-1.FC4.1.legacy.src.rpm
> 
> Also have a binary:
> 
> http://bugs.unl.edu.ar/~martin/mailman-2.1.8-1.FC4.1.legacy.i386.rpm
> 
> At this moment I can't test the rpm because the only FC4 I have is a
> dedicated server. But be sure that the only change I add from privoius
> version was add the las 2 patches (see the .spec file).
> 
> Let me know how things work out.

Thanks a bunch, Martin!  :)   Info on your source package has been placed
into Bugzilla #209891 <http://tinyurl.com/yje83r>, and hopefully we'll soon
have this QA'ed and published in the Legacy repositories!

We still need work on the FC3 version of this package:
   mailman-2.1.5-32.fc3.src.rpm
in Bugzilla #211676.

Thanks again.    :) 		-David

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFWrjKxou1V/j9XZwRAgaqAKCuum1R6ZfoHQ1m4OCjEc0xba1qFACfRqhl
tg3tGgCf7DspC5a5HJsVyqM=
=3xSt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----