Re: Important information regarding the merger of core and extras, and what this means to Legacy
Jesse Keating <[email protected]> Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:10:13 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 09:54, Gene Heskett wrote: > I can't help but agree that its too short. 3 or 6 would be much more > realistic from the users viewpoint, who has his setup all fine tuned and > doesn't want to go thru that on an annual basis. There are other things > to life you know. So why don't you use CentOS which as a annual or every other year release? -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFWy3W4v2HLvE71NURAjHQAJ0Qq//CYPK0cg2sTFA52FCrIFz/yQCgmw02 FYRrinwsAD1n0Vm0Ag42nfE= =xWCO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----