Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:37, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:33:59AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > I would rephrase it in a positive way: Legacy is merged with Core and
> > Extras under one umbrella redefining EOL time marks. E.g. there is a
> > shorter total lifespan, but during that lifespan there is more
> > manpower assigned to get timely security fixes out.
> >
> > The current compromise is that FL was extending Fedora by 12 months,
> > where now it will be only 4 additional months. Reviving FL in these
> > terms would mean to try to extend a couple more months. But let's give
> > that new model a new chance first and measure demand and available
> > manpower after the first implementation of this model.
>
> Sounds good. I think the important thing, though, is to state clearly that
> FC3, FC4, and before are effectively unsupported *right now*.

I think this would be best.  Legacy was an experiment that worked for a period 
of time and has overtime worked less and less.  Interest has waned as well as 
willingness to participate.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFbkfn4v2HLvE71NURAorzAKDCSMCEpY/U7yCtChp609jcgpGDeACgqzin
4/m1kpKz+e6CnuIyX3ABLzk=
=gM8W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----