Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:59:55 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Axel Thimm wrote: > If some statement from legacy is needed about FC3/FC4 before that > decision is made (which IMHO is needed), how about something along a > heading of > > "Fedora Legacy is ending its current support model working towards > direct involvement in maintenance of upcoming Fedora releases in > FL's spirit of extending lifetimes of Fedora releases. Within this > anticipated release model there will be no distinction between FL > and other entities." > > We don't pre-announce anything that hasn't been decided on, but still > show where FL is heading to. > > It's better than simply hanging a "closed" sign upfront the > website. :) But FC3/4 admins reading this statement might think their versions are still supported somehow. At least I don't see 'FC3 and FC4 are effectively EOL right now' between the lines and I think people should know plans have changed and they aren't getting any updates anymore. I think it's sad Fedora Legacy seems to be ending a little prematurely, but I totally understand that the people that were carrying this dying beast have decided to just put it down and let it be. Unfortunately I will have to be migrating our last Fedora servers over to CentOS even sooner now... Thanks for all the work guys, Nils Breunese. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
PGP.sig
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B) - not displayed