Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates
"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:40:45 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Op 30-nov-2006, om 17:11 heeft Matthew Miller het volgende geschreven: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) > wrote: >> Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I >> misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released >> on November 8 2004. Also, FC4 (I don't have any FC4 machines) was >> released on June 13 2005, so I guess that is also EOL effectively. > > In terms of "have their been a meaningful number of updates for real > security problems", they are EOL *now* -- just sans announcement. I know, but not everybody knows. If FL is going to make an official statement I'd vote for telling it like it is. Giving the whole thing a positive spin (by saying Legacy is merging with Core) is fine with me, but I suggest we do tell people FC3 and FC4 are EOL as of *now* (unlike what some people may be thinking). Nils Breunese. -- fedora-legacy-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list