Re: nails in coffins? Re: Openssl updates

"Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)" <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Nov 2006 17:40:45 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.legacy
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Op 30-nov-2006, om 17:11 heeft Matthew Miller het volgende geschreven:

> On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 04:40:55PM +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)  
> wrote:
>> Not for that couple of FC3 machines my clients have running. Or am I
>> misunderstanding the 13 months of support somehow? FC3 was released
>> on November 8 2004. Also, FC4 (I don't have any FC4 machines) was
>> released on June 13 2005, so I guess that is also EOL effectively.
>
> In terms of "have their been a meaningful number of updates for real
> security problems", they are EOL *now* -- just sans announcement.

I know, but not everybody knows. If FL is going to make an official  
statement I'd vote for telling it like it is. Giving the whole thing  
a positive spin (by saying Legacy is merging with Core) is fine with  
me, but I suggest we do tell people FC3 and FC4 are EOL as of *now*  
(unlike what some people may be thinking).

Nils Breunese.

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list