Re: Legacy wiki -- statement?

On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 03:52:11PM -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting "David D. Eisenstein" <[email protected]>:
> 
> >So what do we need to be saying here?  Ideas?
> 
> I think we're going a bit fast...  Do we really want to wrap up the
> project now, or just put it on hold for a while, or wait until we
> hear back about the 13 month plan?  I'm not sure we have a consences
> yet...
> 
> >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legacy
> 
> I would say we can come up with something that says we're evaluating
> our options, and you shouldn't expect (or depend on) timely updates
> at this time, yada yada yada.  But I'm not sure we should completely
> pull the plug yet (without more consensus like discussions) and I sure
> don't think we should say stuff about the open-core/13-month-extension
> and so on that are not yet decided.
> 
> Or, maybe I just missed the consensus?  Or maybe I missed the principles
> statement they are bailing?

The longer we wait the more it will look like a failure. Better be
active and tell the users that we're working on something than letting
them find out by themselves by being bitten.

We can't and shouldn't announce anything on core/extra's behalf, we
just need to say that the current model is being reorganized and while
doing so distributions X, Y, Z have effectively fallen out of
maintenance.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFey1OQBVS1GOamfERAiPYAKCZpgc3sr1Bg7Yp3J3Fj/dgJvu/FQCeIveV
hH/aq0h5rk0HXlUunOukRBI=
=e9D6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----