Re: modules signatures !

I am able to boot the regular 6.14.0
0.rc4.20250226gitac9c34d1e45a.38.fc43 kernel built today, but the
debug kernel still fails with the same "BPF: Invalid offset" errors I
am seeing with 6.13 kernels.

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote:
> > I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334643
> >
> > I also opened an issue on the kernel-ark repo a few days ago:
> > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/176
> >
> > The last debug kernel that worked for me was 6.12.1.
>
> Ah, ok.
>
> Do regulrar rawhide kernels boot ok for you?
>
> (nothing after rc2 here works, I get it not finding the rootfs and
> haven't had any time to debug too much further).
>
> kevin
> --
> _______________________________________________
> test mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
Jason Montleon        | email: [email protected]
Red Hat, Inc.         | gpg key: 0x069E3022
Cell: 508-496-0663    | irc: jmontleo / jmontleon

-- 
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue