Re: modules signatures !

For what it is worth, I had nothing but problems with 6.13 and nvidia. 
Never could get it to work. The 6.14 kernel appears to be working in 
f42. 6.14.0-0.rc3.29.fc42.x86_64


On 2/26/25 1:52 PM, Jason Montleon wrote:
> I am able to boot the regular 6.14.0
> 0.rc4.20250226gitac9c34d1e45a.38.fc43 kernel built today, but the
> debug kernel still fails with the same "BPF: Invalid offset" errors I
> am seeing with 6.13 kernels.
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:18 PM Kevin Fenzi<[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 01:29:51PM -0500, Jason Montleon wrote:
>>> I have had a bug open for awhile on this with no response:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334643
>>>
>>> I also opened an issue on the kernel-ark repo a few days ago:
>>> https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/issues/176
>>>
>>> The last debug kernel that worked for me was 6.12.1.
>> Ah, ok.
>>
>> Do regulrar rawhide kernels boot ok for you?
>>
>> (nothing after rc2 here works, I get it not finding the rootfs and
>> haven't had any time to debug too much further).
>>
>> kevin
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> test mailing list [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email [email protected]
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
>

-- 
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue