Re: Zanata statistics and what it tells about us

Jean-Baptiste <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.internationalization
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Le 11/07/2019 à 07:10, Benson Muite a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> In the unlikely event that the statistics are lower because of 
> automation or because most of the translation has been done, perhaps 
> this is a good thing!
There is no automation in translation. Accessible translation memory are 
not good enough, and the few translators with the skills don't have the 
infrastructure to make any kind of automation.
> It may be good to understand which applications are important for the 
> typical user and need translation. 
Important or not important application to translate varies really much 
from one user to another. Selecting them may create useless conflicts ;)
> Many of these applications are not translated on Fedora infrastructure.

True, but if the priority package groups 
(https://fedora.zanata.org/version-group/view/PriorityPackages) only 
have 9 languages with more that 90%. There is still a lot to do.


> As an example, it may be worth taking a closer look at Pontoon which 
> is used for Firefox. The integration with machine translation can 
> reduce the time needed for translation. As web browsers are important 
> parts of daily computer use, this would likely have an important 
> influence on overall user experience.
>
> Translation memory is helpful, but many platforms require this to be 
> built up for each project. It would be helpful if there was a way to 
> share translations between projects to allow for improved machine 
> translation and translation memories - this still does require human 
> input to produce a final high quality translation, but would reduce a 
> lot of repetitive work. This might just be automated exchanging of po 
> files, but maybe something more could be done. Software extensions 
> that allow people to suggest improved translations, or indicate if a 
> description is unclear would also be helpful.

I understand, so if I rephrase:

1. As a translator, I want to be able to query a translation memory 
containing a wide range of content so that knowledge beyond Fedora 
community is accessible.

   this means: include in our translation memory translation from 
project out of the scope of the fedora translation community.

2. As a translator, I get suggestion from an automation translation 
engine based on a wide range of content to translate faster so that 
translation time is reduced.

   This means we have a tool we fed with our translation memory and 
train it to have better result.

3. As a localization coordinator, I can automatically complete existing 
translation using a translation memory using manual threshold so that 
useless operation for translators are limited.

4. As a localization coordinator, I can automatically complete existing 
translation using an automation translation engine manual threshold so 
that useless operation for translators are limited.

5. As a translator, I can ask for an automated translation of a file and 
review suggestion so that starting a new translation is faster.

4. As a localization coordinator, I have a tool to handle non-fedora 
translation content so that translation memory is continuously update.


Does it match what you wanted to say?


Jean-Baptiste
_______________________________________________
trans mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.