Re: Red Hat Inc's position towards piranha, ipvs, etc not with Red Hat Advanced Server?
nathan hruby <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 07:37 AM, Jeff Bearer wrote: > I'm hoping somebody with some insight can explain this to the list. > What is Red Hat's position of keep up these piranha packages when they > are trying to push Red Hat Advanced Server? > > I'm curious because the piranha-0.6.1-3 and the ipvsadm-1.18-8 packages > were built at Red Hat, will there be others? If not I'm sure the > community will keep it alive, but I'm curious what's in store for the > future of piranha. Er.. ain't RHAS just 7.2 with a finer tuned kernel, tuned postgres, piranha and support? If so than I would think piranha is alive and well. -n -- ...... nathan hruby - [email protected] computer services specialist uga drama http://www.drama.uga.edu/ ......