Red Hat Inc's position towards piranha, ipvs, etc not with Red Hat Advanced Server?

Jeff Bearer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.piranha
Message-ID <1026473884.1476.23.camel@jbearer>
I'm hoping somebody with some insight can explain this to the list.
What is Red Hat's position of keep up these piranha packages when they
are trying to push Red Hat Advanced Server?  

I'm curious because the piranha-0.6.1-3 and the ipvsadm-1.18-8 packages
were built at Red Hat, will there be others?  If not I'm sure the
community will keep it alive, but I'm curious what's in store for the
future of piranha.

-- 
Jeff Bearer, RHCE
Webmaster, PittsburghLIVE.com
2002 EPpy Award Winner, Best Newspaper Website
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.