Re: Installing and Configuring LVS + PIRANHA
Alexandra Alvarado <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On the "active router" I excecuted "tcpdump host 10.10.10.9 -i eth1" and "tcpdump host 100.100.100.9" and on the "backup router" I excecuted "tcpudmp host 10.10.10.200 -i eth1 and "tcpdump host 10.10.10.200" and I can see that both router is checking the heartbeat on both interfaces I have primary_private configured "primary_private = 10.10.10.200" and I have backup_private configured "backup_private = 10.10.10.9" With eth0 is ok, But when I disconnect the "eth1 interface of the active router", the "backup router" doesn't work help!!! :-( Thanks Alexandra Alvarado Jeff Bearer wrote: >I'm not sure I have an answer, but check to see if the backup is >checking the heartbeat on both interfaces with tcpdump. > >also in your lvs.cf, do you have the lines primary, primary_private, >backup and backup_private? maybe you don't have the private config >lines? > >hopefully that helps out a bit. > > > > >On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 01:24, Alexandra Alvarado wrote: > >>I have been configuring lvs + piranha like the graph >> >>>>|-------|------------------------------------------|---------| Public network >>>> |eth0=100.100.100.200 |eth0=100.100.100.9 >>>> |eth0:1=100.100.100.32 (vs1) | >>>> ------|----- -------|----- >>>> | active | | backup | >>>> | router | | router | >>>> ------|----- -------|----- >>>> |eth1=10.10.10.200 |eth1=10.10.10.9 >>>> |eth1:1=10.10.10.32 (NAT router) | >>>>|-------|-|------------------|-----------------|---|----------| Private network >>>> |eth0=10.10.10.14 |eth0=10.10.10.15 |eth0=10.10.10.16 >>>> | | | >>>> |---------| |---------| |---------| >>>> | rs1 | | rs2 | | rs3 | >>>> | >>>>__ >>>>_______| |_________| |_________| >>>> >>>> >>The backup router works when I disconnect the eth0 cable of the active >>router, but if I disconnect the eth1 of the active router the backup >>doesn't work >> >>What I want to say is: What if the eth1is the card damaged and no the >>eth0 of the active router?, what's wrong? >> >>Thanks >> >>Alexandra Alvarado >>