Re: Red Hat Inc's position towards piranha, ipvs, etc not with Red Hat Advanced Server?

has there ever been a follow-up to this?

brdgs
  olaf

Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2002 16:27 schrieb Tom 'spot' Callaway:
> On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 09:48, nathan hruby wrote:
> > On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 07:37 AM, Jeff Bearer wrote:
> > > I'm hoping somebody with some insight can explain this to the list.
> > > What is Red Hat's position of keep up these piranha packages when they
> > > are trying to push Red Hat Advanced Server?
> > >
> > > I'm curious because the piranha-0.6.1-3 and the ipvsadm-1.18-8 packages
> > > were built at Red Hat, will there be others?  If not I'm sure the
> > > community will keep it alive, but I'm curious what's in store for the
> > > future of piranha.
> >
> > Er.. ain't RHAS just 7.2 with a finer tuned kernel, tuned postgres,
> > piranha and support? If so than I would think piranha is alive and well.
>
> Not really. In Advanced Server, piranha has been relegated to LVS only
> usage. The failover technology has been replaced by the Red Hat Cluster
> Manager software.
>
> I hesitate to make an "official position" statement on piranha. I'd
> rather let Mike or Tim do that.