Re: Red Hat Inc's position towards piranha, ipvs, etc not with Red Hat Advanced Server?

AFAIK, piranha is alive and well. I have not heard of any plans to drop it. LVS 
is a significant capability for RHAS, and so I doubt that piranha will be removed.

Olaf Greis wrote:
> has there ever been a follow-up to this?
> 
> brdgs
>   olaf
> 
> Am Freitag, 12. Juli 2002 16:27 schrieb Tom 'spot' Callaway:
> 
>>On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 09:48, nathan hruby wrote:
>>
>>>On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 07:37 AM, Jeff Bearer wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm hoping somebody with some insight can explain this to the list.
>>>>What is Red Hat's position of keep up these piranha packages when they
>>>>are trying to push Red Hat Advanced Server?
>>>>
>>>>I'm curious because the piranha-0.6.1-3 and the ipvsadm-1.18-8 packages
>>>>were built at Red Hat, will there be others?  If not I'm sure the
>>>>community will keep it alive, but I'm curious what's in store for the
>>>>future of piranha.
>>>
>>>Er.. ain't RHAS just 7.2 with a finer tuned kernel, tuned postgres,
>>>piranha and support? If so than I would think piranha is alive and well.
>>
>>Not really. In Advanced Server, piranha has been relegated to LVS only
>>usage. The failover technology has been replaced by the Red Hat Cluster
>>Manager software.
>>
>>I hesitate to make an "official position" statement on piranha. I'd
>>rather let Mike or Tim do that.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list