Re: Problems with takeover even though master is online
DI Peter Burgstaller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi again, I'm using piranha 0.7.0 and ipvsadm 1.20release6-2 As stated before the loadbalancers are linux (Debian/woody) machines with kernel 2.4.19 This is the syslog of both machines, the machines' system times are in sync: After 19:00 it gets interesting... syslog.5:Oct 10 17:04:50 lb01 pulse[13689]: STARTING PULSE AS MASTER syslog.5:Oct 10 17:14:05 lb01 pulse[13689]: partner dead: activating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 17:14:10 lb01 pulse[13716]: gratuitous lvs arps finished syslog.5:Oct 10 19:12:07 lb01 pulse[13689]: partner active: resending arps syslog.5:Oct 10 17:14:06 lb02 pulse[8567]: STARTING PULSE AS BACKUP syslog.5:Oct 10 19:12:05 lb02 pulse[8567]: partner dead: activating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 19:12:10 lb02 pulse[8577]: gratuitous lvs arps finished syslog.5:Oct 10 19:12:12 lb02 pulse[8567]: partner active: deactivating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 19:15:44 lb02 pulse[8567]: partner dead: activating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 19:15:48 lb02 pulse[8567]: partner active: deactivating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 19:15:49 lb02 pulse[8627]: gratuitous lvs arps finished syslog.5:Oct 10 19:41:50 lb02 pulse[8567]: partner dead: activating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 19:41:54 lb02 pulse[8567]: partner active: deactivating lvs syslog.5:Oct 10 19:41:56 lb02 pulse[8675]: gratuitous lvs arps finished As you can see .. the backup server thinks that the master is dead .. even though it isn't. Any advice? Thanks, Peter On Dienstag, Okt 15, 2002, at 22:50 Europe/Vienna, Mike McLean wrote: > What version of piranha were you using? The same version that Alex > was (0.6.0-19)? > > Do the routers flip-flop, or does the backup just take over and remain > active? > > Try adding -v to the pulse command line. > > DI Peter Burgstaller wrote: >> Hi list, >> I'm using piranha on a debian (woody) system with 2 load balancers >> and 2 web servers (nat). I have exactly the same problem as >> described in >> https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/piranha-list/2002-February/ >> 000849.html >> Is there any solution to this problem? >> - Thanks, Peter >> _______________________________________________ >> Piranha-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Piranha-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list