Re: Director Failover
ong cheechye <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Sebastien, I tried to use the new pulse (after patch and compilation) but there is no output telling if pulse start ok or fail when I did a ./pulse start. (i.e pulse is not started). I use the old pulse and it start ok. Thanks Chee Chye --- Sébastien Bonnet <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm using piranha-0.7.0-3.src.rpm. I'm using the > patch file > > piranha-0.7.0.patch.txt you sent on 19-Dec-2002. > > > I don't get pulse1 and pulse2 after make & make > install, only pulse. > > Don't worry about pulse1 and 2. Make built pulse, > which is the one you > should use. > > The reason why I have pulse1 and 2 is because I > needed to have two > separate configs, one for HA, the other for LB. > > I've symlinked pulse[12] to pulse, made 2 init > scripts and written 2 > separate configs. I now have 2 services pulse1 and > pulse2, but they run > the exact same way the usual pulse does. > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 412. > > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > lvs.c.rej > > This hunk is not so important, but I'd still like to > know why it did not > apply :( > > -- > Sébastien Bonnet > Centre de contacts - Experian France > > > > _______________________________________________ > Piranha-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Promote your business from just $5 a month! http://sg.biztools.yahoo.com