Feasability?
Greg Boehnlein <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello,
I have an LVS cluster running in lvs mode with direct routing. I
have a client that wants a Fail-Over solution for his Webserver so that if
his T-1 goes down, we can re-route the traffic over his Ethernet link.
Here is a rough diagram:
VIP -> LVS Router > T-1 > Real Server (x.x.x.x)
In the event of a failure, I want the same to follow this path:
VIP -> LVS Router > Ethernet > Real Server (y.y.y.y)
Essentially what I am attempting to do is see if LVS can support failover
using a single Real-Server.
--
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
KP-216-121-ST