RE: Feasability?

"Posts" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.piranha
Message-ID <002e01c2e9a7$edf82cb0$6501a8c0@XP1>
Give the real server two IP addresses on different subnets & ethernet
cards and two entries in lvs.cf.

Kawika Ohumukini
2-Tier Software, Inc.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Greg Boehnlein
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:19 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Feasability?
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 	I have an LVS cluster running in lvs mode with direct 
> routing. I 
> have a client that wants a Fail-Over solution for his 
> Webserver so that if 
> his T-1 goes down, we can re-route the traffic over his 
> Ethernet link. 
> Here is a rough diagram:
> 
> 
> VIP -> LVS Router > T-1 > Real Server (x.x.x.x)
> 
> In the event of a failure, I want the same to follow this path:
> 
> VIP -> LVS Router > Ethernet > Real Server (y.y.y.y)
> 
> Essentially what I am attempting to do is see if LVS can 
> support failover 
> using a single Real-Server.
> 
> -- 
>     Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, 
> Inc. Company
>          http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
>                              KP-216-121-ST
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> [email protected] 
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pi> ranha-list
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.