RE: Feasability?

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Posts wrote:

> Give the real server two IP addresses on different subnets & ethernet
> cards and two entries in lvs.cf.

Great.. But I don't want to load balance them at all. I want to do 
hot-spare.

So, if IP A is unavailable, then it routes the traffic to IP B, which is 
"local" on our Ethernet.
 
> Kawika Ohumukini
> 2-Tier Software, Inc.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] 
> > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Greg Boehnlein
> > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 1:19 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Feasability?
> > 
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 	I have an LVS cluster running in lvs mode with direct 
> > routing. I 
> > have a client that wants a Fail-Over solution for his 
> > Webserver so that if 
> > his T-1 goes down, we can re-route the traffic over his 
> > Ethernet link. 
> > Here is a rough diagram:
> > 
> > 
> > VIP -> LVS Router > T-1 > Real Server (x.x.x.x)
> > 
> > In the event of a failure, I want the same to follow this path:
> > 
> > VIP -> LVS Router > Ethernet > Real Server (y.y.y.y)
> > 
> > Essentially what I am attempting to do is see if LVS can 
> > support failover 
> > using a single Real-Server.
> > 
> > -- 
> >     Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, 
> > Inc. Company
> >          http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
> >                              KP-216-121-ST
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Piranha-list mailing list
> > [email protected] 
> > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pi> ranha-list
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Piranha-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/piranha-list
> 

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST