Re: Piranha

Mustapha Hadim <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.piranha
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bonjour Sébastien,

Je reviens à un vieux mail.

Sébastien Bonnet a écrit :

> > Hi Mustapha,
>
> > We would like to change the wlc scheduling algorithm to take
> > into account, CPU loads, memory usages, and network load of the
> > real servers.
>
> OK.
>
> > The approach is to periodically cheek these parameters, and
> > update the weight assigned to each real server, according to a
> > given function.
>
> So, your problem/question is not about a scheduler but more likely about
> the monitoring tools. LVS by itself does *never* change RS weights. It
> *can* be the monitoring tools' job.
>
> > A first such approach has been made by Jeremy Kerr, that take
> > into account CPU loads, in LVS.
>
> Yes, I know. What I've understood from what he said is that is
> developping a framework that will help anybody easily plug his own
> program do monitor as wanted.
>
> > Yes,  I have to include monitoring tools in the Piranha software.
> > This is why I am looking to the source files in order to have a
> > global comprehensive view of the software.
>
> OK, now it sounds clear :)
>
> > So, could you please be more accurate ?. In particular, about the
> > relation between the different components of the software.
>
> OK, I'll give it a try. When pulse is started, it tries and sees if
> another pulse is running on the other box. If not, it then starts lvs,
> which then starts one nanny for each RS.
>
> By the same time, lvs adds all active virtual servers (not RS) to IPVS.
>
> Nanny polls a real server and add it to (remove it from) IPVS, and
> regularly adjusts its weight based on CPU load.
>
> This is where you should hack (see getRemoteLoad in nanny.c). Usually,
> the load command is uptime, rup or ruptime, but you can specify whatever
> you want as long as the output is similar to what uptime provides.
>
> The function takes the load as : load average.*:.*(\d\.)+[, ] (if you
> are fluent with regular expressions)
>
> If your remoteload "pluggin" does not produce this, you'll have to
> chance the way getRemoteLoad looks for the load.
>
> If you're willing to code that, I'd propose you use regular expression
> patterns along the remoteload command, which would greatly improve the
> ability to use almost any load reporting program.

Là, je n'ai pas trés bien compris comment les expressions régulières sont
utilisées
dans nanny. Peux-tu stp être un peu plus explicite.

Merci d'avance,
Mustapha
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.