Re: Problem starting up Postgres from pulse
Edward Croft <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.piranha |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1056027130.13126.14.camel@crofts> |
I had received a .diff file that needed to be applied in order to get FOS to recognize scripts. However, there was a couple of lines somewhere in the kernel I believe that needed to be changed in order to get it to work. I will have to look back through the emails to see. I will forward a copy of the .diff to your private email. On Thu, 2003-06-19 at 06:17, Sébastien Bonnet wrote: > Hi Ed, > > > 1.) If both servers start up at approximately the same time, both > > attempt to start the database. This is not good since they share the > > same directory for data. Is there a way to prevent this from happening? > > Usually, when both services start and stay online together (because both > machines have rebooted simultaneously for example), you have a timeout > problem in piranha. Try to increase the timeout value to at least the > time it takes to postgresql to be available. Might solve you problem, at > the cost of slower failovers. > > > 2.) Updates? I had to patch the kernel in order for FOS to be able to > > run scripts. > > FOS is not part of the kernel. What exactly did you patch ? > > > Will this patch be included in future versions? > > Depends on where you got the patch from. As a general rule of thumb, I'd > say no. Too risky to assume a patch you've applied is on the next > release.