Re: High Availability Samba file Server- Piranha FOS+DRBD

> Unless you do want to stick to the original RH naming, you should not
> need to alter anything.
> 
> The main reason I've renamed lvs to pulse is because piranha is not only
> about load balancing (what RH wrongly named lvs) but also failover
> (fos). As the main and only daemon the user interacts with is pulse, it
> makes more sense to have all files named pulse something.
> 
> Finally, the reason for having pulse1 and pulse is because I needed to
> distinct daemons, one for lvs, one for fos.
> 
> Regards,

My only reason for mentioning it was that it was different. I agree with
you that the config file should have matched the daemon name. Works for
everyone else. The only reason I put it back was in hopes that Red Hat
would incorporate this in the future and their upgrade process would
work seemlessly. In the end, your way of doing it is better. I did
forward your patches for Red Hat's review, but as usual have not heard.
I did send it directly to a warm body rather than some generic.