Re: rpmbuild --rebuild ends up in /i386 on ahtlon SMP

Jef Spaleta <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo
Message-ID <1032526225.4096.9.camel@spatula>
I don't think  common applications typically can get compiled to
understand multiple processor usage.  the kernel level stuff handles the
smp, applications typically don't worry about consuming multiple
processors, as far as I understand it...and I don't know whats out there
in the application space so take that "typically" comment with a large
grain of salt.  But it would be interesting to note which applications
out there in the OSS space actually can be compiled to use multiple
processing...or better yet clustered processors.   I have to work with a
lot of scientific codes that use MPI to get access to clustered cpus and
I'd like to peruse some better written and more functional code than the
stuff I have acces to. I've been toying with the idea of building my own
little cluster to play with different clustering technologies...mosix
looks like a good starting point for a home cluster of outdated pc's.

-jef

On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 08:25, Mark C wrote:
> you may have to add an smp flag to that, but I'm not sure, as I don't
> run smp machines.
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA9ixlzrWLDmRitRZURAm+QAJ0Vl7Z/pg2UMIkfRlztYC7xYF5jTgCgowZL
mB+hI1fJHrXbLqF2+IaG69o=
=MbKh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.