Re: Gnome Desktop Only

so your suggestion is "if you want kde then use dont use redhat" 

This e-mail brought to you from kmail in kde 3.0.3 in redhat 7.3

kde (as i am aware) has more desktops out there than gnome

On Wednesday 25 September 2002 20:44, Epps, Aaron M. wrote:
> I've got the agree with the one Desktop approach.  I mean, just think about
> how much development time and energy Red Hat has wasted on KDE.  No offense
> to the KDE lovers out there, but come on, rarely do you ever see anyone
> running RedHat Linux with the KDE Desktop.  As stated before, if someone
> prefers KDE chances are that they're going to be using Mandrake of SuSE.  I
> just think that the developer's time would be better spent working on
> Gnome's new set of Configuration Tools, etc...  Not to mention they could
> get rid of those ridiculously cartoonish new icons.  Does Red Hat really
> have such a large KDE user base that they run the risk of losing loyal
> Gnome users by redesigning the Desktops to look & function similiarly?  I
> think it's more important for Red Hat to conform to the New Gnome 2 User
> Interface standards.   In short, drop KDE, don't risk losing your Gnome
> users for the sake of KDE, focus on what you're good at, Gnome, and conform
> to the Gnome 2 UI Standards.   N! ow, I don't want to start another rant
> about the new look, I just used this example to illustrate a point.  I'm
> curious to hear what some of the GNOME Developers @ Red Hat have to say
> about this.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Limbo-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/limbo-list