Re: It is indeed, a very sad day...
Jef Spaleta <[email protected]> 26 Sep 2002 16:27:02 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1033072022.5811.79.camel@spatula> |
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 15:28, [email protected] wrote: > A while ago I had a little run-in with gstalker that put its data in > ~/.gnome. All 70 Mbytes. > > That was pretty annoying as Gnome insisted in reading it, even after I > removed gstalker. now is this a problem with what gstalker is doing...or gnome? I bet I could write a poorly coded KDE application that did something extremely stupid and messed up how KDE operated. Since gstalker isn't a Redhat package It's hard to blame Redhat for the trouble it causes....and to a lesser extent to blame the core gnome developers since gstalker is obviously doing something horribly broken and unexpected. Its not even listed in gnome.org software map for gosh sakes. What would you have gnome do to fix this problem? Its obviously a problem with gstalker...but what sort of logic would you add that would allow the gnome desktop to know that the 70 Megs were not really needed to be read? -jef
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA9k22WrWLDmRitRZURAhZIAJ9xsD2RFDHQjuFAKaOyaDeJU7tPUgCfWSag y25sWsrRxjKTUxICiiIb+f4= =PVuP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----