Re: redhat 'advanced server' versions?
Peter Bowen <[email protected]> 28 Sep 2002 16:06:01 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.limbo |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 12:35, Tom Georgoulias wrote: > M A Young wrote: > > While we are on the subject of RedHat advanced server, can anyone > > enlighten me as to why the first AS version was numbered 2.1, and what > > the next version number might be? > > I don't think any company wants to roll out an enterprise product with > the release number of 2.0 (especially 1.0!) Point zero releases have a > bad reputation, justified or not. Everyone who's Linux tech-inclinded > knows that this is the first Red Hat advanced server product for the > market, regardless of the release number, but those who don't may not. > > The other plausible reason is that 1.X was a development only release > series and seeded to special partners. My guess is it's probably a > combination of both. It could be that Red Hat Advanced Server 2.1 is a follow-on product to Red Hat Linux 6.2 Enterprise Edition, making it a 2.x series. As for the .1, I would guess marketing. Thanks. Peter