Re: Mozilla 1.3??
Justin Georgeson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
What is the difference between the gtk2 and xft versions? I usually use the xft one, but tried the gtk2 for 1.3, and can't perceive any difference. I have the msttcorefonts package from sourceforge installed, and have enabled the TrueType stuff for mozilla, and all those fonts are listed in the gtk2 version. I thought that was why I was using the xft one. <shrug> Thomas Dodd wrote: > > > Thomas Dodd wrote: > >> >> >> David Krider wrote: >> >>> snooker tb wrote: >>> >>>> I loaded up phoebe 094 with the latest mozilla 1.3 release and it is >>>> working fine, so far. Slightly faster and >>>> better screen draws are the most notable new features. It seems to >>>> work smoother as well. Good update. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> It's smoother because it's not doing anti-aliasing. >> >> >> >> Which version is the, the GTK2 version or the Xft version? >> One of those should "just work" if not both. >> Did you try both yet? >> >> I'm grabbing both SRPMS now, and will try them this weekend on >> my phoebe3 box, my RHL-8.0 box, and my RHL-8.0 + gnomehide + XF86-4.3 >> + kernel-2.4.21p5ac3 + more stuff I don't remember boxes. > > > I build the gtk2 packages from source and it appears fine to me. > The font lists show all the font I have, and they look good to me. > > Any particular page/fon combination you want to check, I'll send a > screen shot of it and you can tell me if aa is enabled or not. > > -Thomas > > > -- ; Justin Georgeson ; http://www.lopht.net ; mailto:[email protected] ; "Free the mallocs, delete the news" -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list