Re: RHL 9 - concerns
"Andreas-Johann Ulvestad" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> My personal take on what Havoc is saying is that it looks like it's time > that your company, which is obviously doing serious work on RedHat, > make an investment in "Enterprise" or "Advanced" server versions. I > think that's the overall message, in fact, to myself included. If you see the credit card bills listing my company's buys of RHL boxed editions... well, it's a long, long list :-) But yeah, I guess it's time to start looking at those bl...ed "advanced server" things, or another distribution for work-related things. I see the main problem with this _INSANE_ lack of binary compability development. I mean - we were just starting to compile and test things for RHL 8, when we haveto scrap everything again since binary compability is broken.. again. This doesn't make our customers wanting to upgrade - they are rather asking us "can't we just stay on RHL 7.3?"... I think RedHat should find out exactly what they want to be using the next 2 years, and stick to it. Otherwise, it's a pure hell for developers. * End of whining :-) -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list