Re: RHL 9 - concerns
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Organization | Red Hat, Inc. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 12:26, Andreas-Johann Ulvestad wrote: > I see the main problem with this _INSANE_ lack of binary compability > development. I mean - we were just starting to compile and test things for > RHL 8, when we haveto scrap everything again since binary compability is > broken.. again. it's not as bad as you make it sound. *Correct* applications will just work either way. Only apps that did invalid things (really invalid) have a chance of breaking withe the NPTL change.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+gFJWxULwo51rQBIRAkBHAJ9QuWw+gx24yUcHjdlqerWkUjJ2fwCeIoqt f0dNV3xio9mpzU8uHanE9tk= =jupF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----