Re: RHL 9 - concerns

David Holden <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe
Organization IUCr
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 04:03, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:14:05PM -0500, David Krider wrote: 
> > In my mind, there's quite a gap between the $800 and 3-year-lifecycle 
> > product and the $100 and 1-year-lifecycle product
> 
> FWIW, I'm pretty sure the Enterprise Linux ES has a $349 version with
> 5 years errata.
> See -
>   http://www.redhat.com/software/rhel/purchase/
>   http://www.redhat.com/apps/support/errata/rhlas_errata_policy.html
> 
> Havoc

Sorry, I'm still unclear on this.


Does this mean if I purchase RHL ES at $349 I get 5 years security
updates included for that price. Or will I additionally have to pay a
yearly subscription to RHN on top of this price?

 thanks.

 Dave.


-- 
Dr. David Holden. (Systems Developer)

Visit: Crystallography Journals Online <http://journals.iucr.org>

Thanks in advance:-
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See: <http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>

UK Privacy (R.I.P)  : http://www.stand.org.uk/commentary.php3
Public GPG key available on request.

-- 99% of politicians give the rest a bad name --
------------------------------------------------- 



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.