Re: Pre-announcement?
Tom Diehl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.phoebe |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:44:58AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 12:38:02AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:29:07PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > > It is simply "Red Hat Linux 9", no ".0". Quite similar to "Red > > > > Hat Linux 7" in the naming aspect. > > > And I sure do see "7.0" on your FTP server now.... :) > > > > Also on this page: <https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rh7-errata.html> > > "Red Hat Linux 7.0 General Advisories". So you can see why people may not be > > taking your nine-point-nothing thing too seriously. > > Oops, you caught us. In the interest of being totally transparent, > "Red Hat Linux 7" was something that happened much closer to its > release than the Red Hat Linux 9 decision. There weren't many good > reasons to call it 7 and not 7.0. There ARE good reasons drop the .0 > from Red Hat Linux 9. > > It's not a .0 release, it's just the next release. Ummmm, will the next release (after 9) be called Red Hat Linux 2004? :)) -- .............Tom "Nothing would please me more than being able to [email protected] hire ten programmers and deluge the hobby market with good software." -- Bill Gates 1976 We are still waiting .... -- Phoebe-list mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list