Re: nano editor in Shrike?

Michael Wardle wrote:
> Hi
> 
> A user on this list recently mentioned that he liked pico as a text
> editor, and was disappointed that pine had been removed from the Shrike
> distribution.
> 
> I understand Red Hat's reasons for removing pine, however I am a little
> surprised to not see packages for the GNU pico clone "nano" in Phoebe 3,
> and suspect it is therefore not included in Shrike.  I find this odd,
> because I'm pretty sure it was included in previous releases, including
> Valhalla.
> 
> A number of newbie users seem to prefer nano over vi or emacs, so I'd
> like Red Hat to consider once again including nano in its distribution
> package set, particularly now that pine and pico are gone.
> 
> Thanks for your consideration
> 



Not Pine also! It is a program that I use myself.

Jim

-- 
Bucy's Law:
	Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list