Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 11:52, Gerry Tool wrote:
> Michael Wardle wrote:
> > A number of newbie users seem to prefer nano over vi or emacs, so I'd
> > like Red Hat to consider once again including nano in its distribution
> > package set, particularly now that pine and pico are gone.
> 
> To get this to be considered, add it as an RFE (request for extension) into 
> bugzilla.redhat.com.

Red Hat engineers have seemingly not responded to bug reports I filed,
even those with patches supplied.  There are a number of RFEs for
packages I would like to see included, especially Webmin, and there is
no action there either.

I happily use Vim, so I don't think I'll waste my time. :-|

-- 
Michael Wardle <[email protected]>
Adacel Technologies



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list