Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:03:24PM -0500, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 11:45, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > so all of mutt, evolution and squirrelmail are politely sharing
> > your mail folders?  
> > 
> 
> Not speaking for Edward, but I'll bet his answer is "of course!"

"of course!" ;-)

As Jeremy mentioned, using IMAP eliminates most of the oddball sharing
problems that can crop up. I can use <insert random client here> when I'm
remote if needed, or squirrelmail if all I have available is a web browser.
ssh and mutt do the job nicely when the desktop I'm at makes browsing a
painful experience.

The only "problem" I have, if you can call it that, is that when I open
my mailbox with Evolution, and don't open a folder with new messages (I
have a few procmail recipes dumping new messages into a lot of subfolders
automatically), mutt sees those messages as "Old" so tabbing through new
messages doesn't quite work right. I suspect Evolution is being a little
overzealous in it's inspection of subfolders, but it's possible I'm doing
something wacky too.

-- 
Edward S. Marshall <[email protected]>
http://esm.logic.net/

Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list