Re: nano editor in Shrike?

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 11:21:08AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 10:45:10AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > recommendations?  i've heard good things about mutt, although
> > i've never tried it yet.  (and the religious fervor of muttheads
> > can be just a bit disturbing. :-)
> 
> Mutt is good. It induces fervor because it's very geeky -- lots and lots of
> config options, and the ability to set it up to act pretty much exactly how
> you want.

Yeah for me it induces fervent "why can't this thing just work right
out of the box?!" I spent hours configuring it and it still isn't
quite right.

Does that count as fervor? ;-)

Havoc



-- 
Phoebe-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/phoebe-list