How secure is RedHat 7.1 + updates?
Chris de Vidal <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.seawolf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We have a product that _requires_ RedHat 7.1. The dillemma is it will be using PostgreSQL, Apache with SSL, and OpenSSH on an internet-facing server (through a firewall). I'd be more comfortable using RedHat 9 but we don't have that luxury here. If we apply all updates, will it be as secure as RedHat 9? I know it has older applications, but RedHat does a pretty good job of patching older stuff. I have seen changelog bugfixes/patches on older versions of PHP, for example, that make it as secure as the latest version, even if the version number is a few digits behind. The alternative is to install Windows 2000 ::shudder::, which has a significantly longer span of support. According to one security expert I know, it is as secure. I just wanted your second opinion before we continue. /dev/idal P.S. RedHat sure did complicate things by cutting short support. I understand why but I'm not very happy about it. Oh, well, they didn't ask me (: __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo http://search.yahoo.com