Re: numa memory
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.release.taroon.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 16:14 -0800, Stephen Mah wrote: > I've got a user with 4 gigs of memory on a dual Opteron machine. With > the standard kernel, it sees 2 gigs and 3 gigs with memory mapping > turned off in his bios. With the hugemem kernel running, it sees 4 gigs. > Is this expected with the standard smp kernel? He's complaining of extra > overhead with this kernel. nope. also on opteron the -hugemem kernel has no extra overhead (due to some hardware features in that cpu). But.... I am wondering. Is this forum really the best way to escalate customer support escalations for you? ;) I'm pretty sure VMWare has a support relationship with Red Hat, and I also suspect that that is a much better venue to get better and more detailed answers (also because you can give RH more information in a confidential way) -- Taroon-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/taroon-list