Re: vlc 1.1.0?
Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Axel Thimm <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 08:32:14AM -0400, Brian Long wrote: >>>> > Has anyone tried to compiled vlc-1.1.0 which was released yesterday? >>>> I >>>> > downloaded the AtRPMS src.rpm and tried replacing the tarball, but it >>>> > wouldn't build cleanly on f13 x86_64. I'm not sure if I should pass >>>> any >>>> > extra options to rpmbuild to get it to compile. >>>> >>>> I gave it a fast try and it fails on patching with >>>> vlc-0.9.2-fix_font_path.patch. I haven't checked why and how to fix it >>>> yet, though. >>>> >>>> > It would be nice if we could get vlc-1.1.0 in testing; I'm not sure >>>> it's >>>> > ready for primetime, but it does support VAAPI GPU acceleration on >>>> Linux. >>>> >>>> If it builds and works I would move it right into stable. Or is there >>>> any indication 1.1.x would be less stable than 1.0.x? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I adapted the patches, but the arm assembler code is not compiling. >>> Any thoughts? >>> >>> >>> /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 >>> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../include -DSYS_LINUX >>> -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector >>> --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686 -mtune=atom >>> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -c -o arm_colorconv.lo `test -f >>> 'libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S' || echo >>> './'`libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S: Assembler messages: >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:37: Error: no such instruction: `ldr >>> ip,[sp],' >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:38: Error: no such instruction: >>> `stmfd sp!,{r4-r8,lr}' >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:44: Error: no such instruction: `bic >>> ip,' >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:46: Error: expecting operand after >>> ','; got nothing >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:47: Error: no such instruction: `blt >>> 2f' >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:49: Error: no such instruction: `ldrb >>> r4,[r1],' >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:50: Error: no such instruction: `ldrb >>> r8,[r2],' >>> libswscale_nokia770/arm_colorconv.S:51: Error: no such instruction: `ldrb >>> r12,[r1],' >>> >>> >>> >> I removed --enable-omapfb because it is not compiling anymore, and I >> finally got >> a working vlc 1.1.0 >> >> >> I still need to check rhel5, because I included some new options, >> which certainly will not build there. >> >> But we should have a working version later ... >> >> >> > I have a working version here, tested on F12: > > http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-1.1.0-53.fc12.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/vlc-1.1.0-53.fc12.src.rpm> > > > The vlc plugin does not build for F12. In this case, > it should be built using --without mozilla > > F13 is fine, though... > > It also builds for rhel5, but I could only use the aa driver, > that is, the video output is somehow broken. > More tests are needed for rhel5 to figure what is happening, > but I do no have time for this at the moment. > > Therefore, I would go with caution with version 1.1.0. > > > I think the problem with rhel5 is that I had to disable xcb during the build, and XVideo, GLX, and X11 depend on it. Maybe someone can fix the issues ... Also, the Atrpms rhel5 testing repo has to be used for flac, libogg and speex. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ