Re: "Fixed" flash player 64 bits for bug #638477

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:20 AM, John Robinson <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On 25/12/2010 15:22, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, Axel
>>
>> after fighting against the awkward  sound in F14, when using flash 64
>> bit plugin,
>> which affected mp3 streams from flash (e.g., mpd/ampache), I finally
>> have a patched flash-plugin,
>> which seems to improve the sound a lot (it is working fine for me):
>>
>>
>> http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/flash-plugin-10.3-1.fc14.src.rpm<http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/flash-plugin-10.3-1.fc14.src.rpm>
>>
>> Please, follow this thread:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477
>>
>> The .src.rpm just applies the solution on Comment 94:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477#c94
>>
>
> You shouldn't be distributing the binary rpm produced by this, because
> you'd be breaking Adobe's licencing terms, see comments 143-146 of the same
> thread: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477#c143
>
> You might be OK shipping a rpm which includes Ray Strode's script and
> performs the modification post-install, but I wouldn't swear to it.
>
>
>  and I really endorse Linus Torvalds' position on this subject.
>>
>
> Me too. </aol>
>
>
>
That is why I am just giving the .src.rpm. The fix is applied during the
build. I did not modify anything ...

-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ