Re: "Fixed" flash player 64 bits for bug #638477

On 12/31/2010 09:22 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 11:20 AM, John Robinson 
> <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     On 25/12/2010 15:22, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>
>         Hi, Axel
>
>         after fighting against the awkward  sound in F14, when using
>         flash 64
>         bit plugin,
>         which affected mp3 streams from flash (e.g., mpd/ampache), I
>         finally
>         have a patched flash-plugin,
>         which seems to improve the sound a lot (it is working fine for
>         me):
>
>         http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/flash-plugin-10.3-1.fc14.src.rpm
>         <http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/flash-plugin-10.3-1.fc14.src.rpm>
>
>         Please, follow this thread:
>
>         https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477
>
>         The .src.rpm just applies the solution on Comment 94:
>
>         https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477#c94
>
>
>     You shouldn't be distributing the binary rpm produced by this,
>     because you'd be breaking Adobe's licencing terms, see comments
>     143-146 of the same thread:
>     https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638477#c143
>
>     You might be OK shipping a rpm which includes Ray Strode's script
>     and performs the modification post-install, but I wouldn't swear
>     to it.
>
>
>         and I really endorse Linus Torvalds' position on this subject.
>
>
>     Me too. </aol>
>
>
>
> That is why I am just giving the .src.rpm. The fix is applied during 
> the build. I did not modify anything ...

You are not even allowed to redistribute originals without prior permission!