[Slightly OT] Help building an srpm

John Robinson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel
Organization None; Disorganization: Total
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi folks. Sorry for being slightly off-topic, since I'm asking about a 
non-atrpms srpm, but you guys know lots about building stuff, especially 
more recent stuff on older distros so please excuse me :-)

I'm trying to build fuse-ext2 
http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fuse-ext2-0.0.7-4.fc13.src.rpm 
on EL5 (CentOS 5.5, kernel 2.6.18-243 x86_64) and it bails out as follows:

+ autoreconf -si
configure.ac:83: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_TYPE_SSIZE_T
       If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
       See the Autoconf documentation.
autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.22723 (%build)

I get the same building straight from the source.

A little Googling suggests I need autoconf 2.60 or later and all I have 
is 2.59. Anyone got a RPM (x86_64) I can safely use? Will I have to 
update other build tools as well? Building the building tools is too 
much for me :-)

I tried also going to the older ext2fuse project, even though I don't 
like its scary warnings about it toasting hard drives, but its build 
bails out with something similar but different:

imager.c:41: error: conflicting types for ‘ssize_t’
/usr/include/unistd.h:191: error: previous declaration of ‘ssize_t’ was here

If you want to know why I want fuse-ext2 - I need to mount an ext2 
filesystem which has 16K blocks (because it was created on a ReadyNAS 
which has a Sparc CPU with 16K pages), while my kernel's ext2 filesystem 
apparently only supports blocks up to 4K. I haven't got the drive yet 
but it's in the post and I'd like to be ready :-)

Thanks in advance,

John.


_______________________________________________
atrpms-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.