Re: [ATrpms-users] Myth 0.27 Plans

On 29/09/2013 5:22 PM, Stephen Collier wrote:
> On 29/09/2013 2:33 PM, Stephen Collier wrote:
>> On 29/09/2013 2:18 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> do you want to update ATrpms' qt47 to qt48? The qt47 is a Fedora 
>>> backport you can diff the spec file to see what was done. Thanks!!! :-)
>>>
>>> Stephen Collier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> On 26/09/2013 10:47 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Stephen Collier
>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>      On 24/09/2013 2:06 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>          I will respin a 0.26.1 with all current fixes and a 0.27 
>>>>> with
>>>>>          the few
>>>>>          fixes that are already in the git.
>>>>>
>>>>>      Any chance of spinning 0.27 for EL6?
>>>>>
>>>>>      I'm doing some test compiles using epel qt5.1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm assuming you already know the pitfalls of qt5 for mythtv?
>>>>>
>>>>> For those that don't, I was experimenting with this for RPM Fusion
>>>>> EPEL 6 packages but there's a couple of components/plugins that won't
>>>>> build with qt5 and even if it does, it's not guaranteed to work.
>>>> Until
>>>>> someone has time to do the full port, it's not supported upstream so
>>>>> unless you have a patch, any bugs you file will probably be
>>>> ignored...
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Richard
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>> I now have qt48 working with the stcok atrpm 0.26.1 rpms let me 
>>>> know if
>>>>
>>>> you want to try them.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Stephen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>
>> Axel,
>>
>> I started with the F19 spec and then backported everything from 
>> qt47.spec to maintain a seperate base like was done with qt47 to 
>> maintain the stock qt4.6. I'm still testing - recompiling 
>> mythtv-0.26.1 now as it doen't play nicely changing qt versions - the 
>> mysql connection isn't working properly. I'll let you know if the 
>> recompiled 0.26 is OK.
>>
>> Then I'll move to 0.27 and test.
>>
>> The upgrade to qt48 is not smooth as qt47 has phonon compiled in and 
>> qt48 doesn't. The only way I could get the upgrade was to rpm -e 
>> --nodeps qt47-webkit qt47-mysql. then yum install qt48 qt48-mysql 
>> qt48-webkit. I may have to make an rpm for phonon but I hope not as 
>> fedora are only using a qt4.6 based one so the phonon built into 
>> qt4.6 may be OK.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Stephen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
> It is now working fully with recompile. I'll rebuild 0.27 tomorrow and 
> test.
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
>
the rpms build for 0.27 with no issues on el6 X86_64