Re: [ATrpms-users] Myth 0.27 Plans

Stephen Collier <[email protected]> Tue, 01 Oct 2013 00:23:56 +1000
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 29/09/2013 9:55 PM, Stephen Collier wrote:
> On 29/09/2013 5:22 PM, Stephen Collier wrote:
>> On 29/09/2013 2:33 PM, Stephen Collier wrote:
>>> On 29/09/2013 2:18 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> do you want to update ATrpms' qt47 to qt48? The qt47 is a Fedora 
>>>> backport you can diff the spec file to see what was done. Thanks!!! 
>>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Stephen Collier <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> On 26/09/2013 10:47 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Stephen Collier
>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      On 24/09/2013 2:06 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          I will respin a 0.26.1 with all current fixes and a 0.27 
>>>>>> with
>>>>>>          the few
>>>>>>          fixes that are already in the git.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Any chance of spinning 0.27 for EL6?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      I'm doing some test compiles using epel qt5.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm assuming you already know the pitfalls of qt5 for mythtv?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For those that don't, I was experimenting with this for RPM Fusion
>>>>>> EPEL 6 packages but there's a couple of components/plugins that 
>>>>>> won't
>>>>>> build with qt5 and even if it does, it's not guaranteed to work.
>>>>> Until
>>>>>> someone has time to do the full port, it's not supported upstream so
>>>>>> unless you have a patch, any bugs you file will probably be
>>>>> ignored...
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>>> I now have qt48 working with the stcok atrpm 0.26.1 rpms let me 
>>>>> know if
>>>>>
>>>>> you want to try them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Stephen
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>>
>>> Axel,
>>>
>>> I started with the F19 spec and then backported everything from 
>>> qt47.spec to maintain a seperate base like was done with qt47 to 
>>> maintain the stock qt4.6. I'm still testing - recompiling 
>>> mythtv-0.26.1 now as it doen't play nicely changing qt versions - 
>>> the mysql connection isn't working properly. I'll let you know if 
>>> the recompiled 0.26 is OK.
>>>
>>> Then I'll move to 0.27 and test.
>>>
>>> The upgrade to qt48 is not smooth as qt47 has phonon compiled in and 
>>> qt48 doesn't. The only way I could get the upgrade was to rpm -e 
>>> --nodeps qt47-webkit qt47-mysql. then yum install qt48 qt48-mysql 
>>> qt48-webkit. I may have to make an rpm for phonon but I hope not as 
>>> fedora are only using a qt4.6 based one so the phonon built into 
>>> qt4.6 may be OK.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>
>> It is now working fully with recompile. I'll rebuild 0.27 tomorrow 
>> and test.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
>>
> the rpms build for 0.27 with no issues on el6 X86_64
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
>
the qt src rpm is now in my dropbox https://db.tt/cQlm0m0D

I've changed the spec so it doesn't interfere with  qt47 but it only 
provides qt48 not qt4. I've left it so qt47-devel cannot coexist as I 
see problems if thats allowed.

hence mythtv spec needs changing to something like
%if 0%{?fedora} > 16 || 0%{?rhel} > 6
Requires: qt-mysql
%else
Requires: qt48-mysql
%endif
thats assuming rh7 has qt4.8 or 5

cheers
Stephen