Re: Packaging Dilemma
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Tue, 18 May 2004 18:41:19 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 12:26:33AM +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: > On Monday 17 May 2004 23:31, Jeff Pitman wrote: > > Thoughts? > > Would I be shot on-sight if I prefixed everything in /opt/pyvault and > put a path to /opt/pyvault/bin in /etc/profile.d/pyvault.sh? ;-) Yes! :) Why do you want to hide these away? IIRC you wanted to have a python rpm containing the latest python bits (if the vendor does not already provide it). This should be installable w/o conflicts to the vendor python (like python1 and python2 coexist). You only may not use shortcuts like /usr/bin/python and /usr/bin/python2. But if you package python 3.1.2 you own /usr/bin/python312 :) And all python version dependent packages go into /usr/lib/python3.1.2. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net _______________________________________________ repo-coord mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/repo-coord
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAqjyvQBVS1GOamfERAlVUAJ420z6ujaG/1py1WYeh1LnMh7yk8ACfWOnk gTVO3weO091T102tof40xRg= =8Ffu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----