gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination

286 articles on record, showing the most recent 50.

Re: PPC Repos
Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:20:10 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #286
PPC Repos
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:22:06 -0400
John Tumblin <[email protected]> • #285
fwd: Re: F7 Test 1 coming soon
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:37:10 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #284
Pre-FOSDEM meeting
Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:36:53 +0100 (CET)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #283
Re: ATrpms: rhX, rhfcY becomes RHLX, fcY
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:41:27 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #282
ATrpms: rhX, rhfcY becomes RHLX, fcY
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:01:33 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #281
fc6 version tag added to bugzilla
Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:04:42 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #280
fwd: [apt-rpm] New website, mailinglist and 0.5.15lorg3 released!
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:35:28 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #279
Warning: RHL chroots on FC5/2.6.16 break
Tue, 18 Apr 2006 20:18:53 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #278
FC5 repos
Sun, 2 Apr 2006 21:13:12 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #277
[apt-rpm] Time to stir up the competition ;)
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 20:45:55 +0200
Panu Matilainen <[email protected]> • #276
New package repository
Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:57:14 -0800
"Michael A. Peters" <[email protected]> • #275
fc5 version tag added to bugzilla.atrpms.net
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:38:46 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #274
Fedora Core blocking package replacements by default
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 05:38:07 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #273
Re: Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:07:28 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #272
Re: Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:03:52 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #271
Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 11:41:36 +0800
"lzuxz" <[email protected]> • #270
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 17:30:24 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #269
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:13:04 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #268
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:48:12 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #267
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:34:39 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #266
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 16:00:02 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #265
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:37:35 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #264
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 14:40:31 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #263
Re: Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:12:09 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #262
Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:01:02 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #261
Re: [repo-coord] dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 18:05:13 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #260
Re: dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 13:55:11 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #259
Re: [repo-coord] dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 03:10:49 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #258
Re: RPM compatibility
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 12:40:41 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #257
dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:15:44 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #256
medley of packages: 7244 packages for FC4/i386
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:21:34 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #255
Bugzilla upgrade
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 22:46:17 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #254
fc4 version tag added to bugzilla.atrpms.net
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:25:20 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #253
Re: Which distributions to support?
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:44:41 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #252
Which distributions to support?
Tue, 31 May 2005 14:21:20 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #251
Upgrading kernels (and kmdls) with apt/smart/yum
Sat, 28 May 2005 09:16:40 +0200
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #250
RPMforge invitation
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 21:55:32 +0200 (CEST)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #249
Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:51:58 -0300
Gustavo Niemeyer <[email protected]> • #248
Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:51:42 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #247
Re: Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:40:36 +0100 (CET)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #246
Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:16:11 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #245
Re: smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:16:26 +0100 (CET)
Dag Wieers <[email protected]> • #244
smart(dag) and atrpms-package-config(at)
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:22:51 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #243
Re: [repo-coord] Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:06:49 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #242
Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:58:59 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #241
Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:43:43 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #240
Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 12:52:43 -0500
seth vidal <[email protected]> • #239
Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:31 +0800
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> • #238
repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 17:13:26 +0100
Axel Thimm <[email protected]> • #237