dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)

Axel Thimm <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Jul 2005 11:15:44 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.general,gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============1517807731072982334==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wchHw8dVAp53YPj8"
Content-Disposition: inline


--wchHw8dVAp53YPj8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ccing repo-coord as this is more of interest there.

On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:12:00PM +1000, Michael Mansour wrote:
> In upgrading one of my FC1 machines to the new yum you've supplied in you=
r repo:
> [...]
> medley-package-config-99-1.rhfc1.at
>=20
> this seemed to contain everything I wanted (actually more than I wanted) =
but
> also missed newrpms:
>=20
> [newrpms.sunsite.dk]
> name=3DFedora Core $releasever NewRPMS.sunsite.dk
> baseurl=3Dhttp://newrpms.sunsite.dk/apt/redhat/en/i386/fc$releasever
>=20
> which I added myself as a repo drop file.

But only for yum20 headers, or even yum 2.3.x? There is no repodata
dir there.

> Anyway, running a "yum check-update", al the kde-redhat and jpackage stuff
> failed so I added "enable=3D0" to each of those repoid's, and then ran ag=
ain:

Hm, they used to ship FC1 repos. I see that kde-redhat removed the FC1
repo. But jpackage for FC1 with the new yum format should still be alive at
http://mirrors.sunsite.dk/jpackage/1.6/fedora-1/free

> http://apt.sw.be/fedora/1/en/i386/dag/
>=20
> RPMS/                   28-Jul-2005 02:41    -  =20
> headers/                28-Jul-2005 02:41    - =20
>=20
> which doesn't contain the required repodata directory.
>=20
> This seems to mean that when upgrading to yum 2.3.4, we lose access to Da=
g's
> repo which seems to be yum 2.0 compatible?
>=20
> Is there a way to make this work?

Kindly asking Dag to provide the metadata support? :)

But my personal recommendation is to use smart. smart can access both
apt and yum repos (but not yum20 repos), so smart does have the
largest set of packages available. There are still (with FC4) some
repos that only export apt metadata.

Thanks for the feedback on medley-package-config for FC1. I'll wait a
couple of days to see whether any repo maintainer will change anything
and will fix medley-package-config.
--=20
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

--wchHw8dVAp53YPj8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC6fPAQBVS1GOamfERAgrpAJ9/W9ao3vbmbefbu4EMsqFYSQ6AQACbBz+l
7Bx46kzEeUOK4aOOzzuXedU=
=crPp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wchHw8dVAp53YPj8--


--===============1517807731072982334==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

--===============1517807731072982334==--