Sub-Repo for Yum and Smart
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> Mon, 12 Sep 2005 23:01:02 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi: Starting a new thread on this based on "dag, newrpms, kde-redhat, jpackage for FC1 (was: Dag FC1 repo for newer yum version)" sent earlier this month. I've been reworking PyVault with a new base standard: CentOS 3/4 and FC 3/4. Due to the target being developers and bleeding edge folks for the FC line, I dropped 1/2. Also, I have a target for those running servers, thus, CentOS. In my reworking, I dropped support for Apt. And, as the repos move forward, I would encourage all to do the same. Especially since smart has matured enough and it reuses md from other sources (ie xml-md). I am willing to contribute to a micro-repo dedicated to providing a common rpm, yum, and smart setup for at least the distros I mentioned above. I'd also be willing to not continue the yum20 line at all; but, I see that the political strings would be difficult to pull. I've just barely completed work on getting yum 2.4.0 compiled and running for the above. It also runs under python 2.4.1 on all platforms. I've also distilled the python component out of RPM: http://symbiont.mn.sabren.com/rpm-python/ And it works great. My next revision will strip out the configure madness and focus totally on API defines rather than config.h. This release also can compile under the different rpms distributed with the above. So, it is possible to keep the vendor-supplied rpm. Anyway, I started working on libxml2 stuff and thought, I should take this from atrpms. Then, I looked at repo-coord and thought maybe we should startup this discussion... Thoughts? -- -jeff