Re: Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not signed, why?

Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:03:52 +0800
Newsgroups gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday 25 September 2005 11:41, lzuxz wrote:
> I just yum update ,but i found yum doesn't install anything?
> but reply Package gnome-vfs2-devel-2.12.0-2.1.fc4.nr.i386.rpm is not
> signed

You'll have to notify Rudolf about this package. It may have accidently 
been pushed out without signing.  It can happen on occasion.

-- 
-jeff