Re: repo agnostic package resolvers (was: Latest apt broken?)
Jeff Pitman <[email protected]> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:47:31 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.freshrpms.user,gmane.linux.redhat.rpm.atrpms.repo-coordination |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 20 January 2005 00:13, Axel Thimm wrote: > Works well if there are a > handfull of them but does not scale well. Perhaps smart deals better > with file conflicts (e.g. auto-promotes them to Conflicts:) and > behaves better, but I haven't tested. Interesting RFE to be aware of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=131181 Implemented in 4.4. (I think; haven't tested, yet.) Although, maybe off-topic for this thread, but Obsoleting directories/files eases packager's effort in determining what names have been used before (twisted, Twisted, python-Twisted, python-twisted) and just Obsolete the provided dir which will nuke whatever existing packages are there. Likewise, the repo-config packages could use similar methods in the future. (FC4+, I guess.) have fun, -- -jeff