Re: Versioning proposal, please comment (was: disttag -- repotag)

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:54:58PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 13:39, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > please comment on this, I believe that a common versioning scheme is
> > > important. It can't be that difficult to formulate an acceptable
> > > implementation. ;)
> > > 
> > > I think it all turns around defining acceptable disttags, the rest is
> > > more or less straightened out by now. I think the "fc" and "el"
> > > disttags are liked by everybody, one needs to have a
> > > smaller-than-"fc1" disttag for RHL releases, which could be the
> > > proposed "fc0.".
> > 
> > FYI, fedora.us went with .1 and .2 for FC1 and FC2.  So no fc.
> > 
> > I can't recall/care to lookup why this was chosen over fc1 or fc2.
> 
> Freshrpms, Dries and I have settled for the following convention:
> 
> 	0.el2
> 	0.rh7
> 	0.rh8
> 	0.rh9
> 	1.el3
> 	1.fc1
> 	1.fc2
> 	1.fc3
> 	2.el4
> 	2.fc4

And what about the arguments about disttags starting with letters
mangling with the buildtag? If you want distepochs, you should choose
letters like "a.el2", "b.el3".

What speaks against the "fc" for all tag? Even fedora.us people had
been advokating it, so it would have a chance to become a standard.

> So that we do not depend on name-changes and that we have an upgrade path 
> from fc to el. This means that for every new Enterprise release (which is 
> about every 18 to 24 months) will have an increment. I expect this to be 
> at least 10 years from now and lots of things will have changed by then. ;)
> 
> We also have 0.yd2 and 0.yd3 for Yellow Dog Linux 2 and 3 and may have a 
> similar convention for cAos when it arrives.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

_______________________________________________
repo-coord mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/repo-coord

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAzeeoQBVS1GOamfERAuf4AJ9XS0fzAD1vRkS0op6NxWHLS0W0vACfSGI4
gkqJKPiB6lZ2fRGHeLY04sc=
=RppN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----